French Wax Figure Co. v. Jupp Baxter Co.
Cuyahoga Circuit Court
Error to the Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga county.
1Opinion of the CourtMarvin, J.
This is a proceeding in error to the court of commom pleas of this county.
Suit was brought in that court - by the plaintiff here against the defendant here, and judgment taken against the defendant upon default. This judgment was taken at the September term, 1900, and, at the same term, upon motion of the defendant that default was set aside and the case reinstated upon the docket of the court.
It is to reverse this order, setting aside th9 default, that this proceeding is prosecuted.
On the part of the plaintiff in error it is conceded that the granting of the motion was within the discretion…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Contreras v. HaynesTexas Supreme Court · 1884
- Ward v. Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
- Field v. MatsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1844
- Schultz v. MeiselbarIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
- Phelps v. OsgoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.