Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Walker v. Kroger Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 21, 1987No. 73285, 73286Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBenham, Judge

I agree with the majority that the trial court correctly granted summary judgment to Kroger on Counts 3 and 4 of appellant Walker’s complaint since the theories of recovery raised in those counts were or might have been put in issue in the cause of action actually raised in the federal court suit. However, because I do not believe the doctrine of res judicata bars appellant from asserting the allegations contained in Counts 1 and 2 of his complaint, I must dissent to the majority’s reversal of the judgment in Case No. 73286.

The complaint in the case before us contains four counts in which…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Caswell v. CaswellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  2. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. MusgroveSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
  3. Nationwide-Penncraft, Inc. v. Royal Globe InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  4. Massey v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  5. Nationwide-Penncraft, Inc. v. Royal Globe InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API