Legal Opinion
Ortiz v. Commissioner of Correction
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided November 8, 2005No. AC 25633PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
The petitioner, George Ortiz, appeals following the denial of his petition for certification to appeal from the habeas court’s denial of his amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus in which he alleged that he was denied the effective assistance of trial counsel and that his guilty plea, rendered pursuant to the *243Alford doctrine,1 was not made intelligently and voluntarily. We dismiss the appeal.
The court made the following findings of fact that are relevant to the petitioner’s appeal. At the time the petitioner pleaded guilty, on November 21,1991, he was charged in three separate…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Simms v. Warden, State PrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Owens v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by9 opinions
- Watson v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Charles v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Nicholson v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Tilus v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- Amado v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.