Legal Opinion

Walsh v. Richardson

Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati

Decided July 1, 1907Published

1Opinion of the CourtHosea, J.

A residual question of some difficulty arises in this case upon the following facts:

The defendant, Richardson, claiming to have duly paid *196off a mortgage given by him to the Cincinnati Savings & Loan Society, upon certain lots on Central- avenue in Cincinnati (the County Records showing an apparent cancellation in due form), obtained a loan of $5,000 from the Walnut Hills Savings & Loan Company, securing it by a mortgage upon the same property, representing it to be a first mortgage, excepting for the lien of a general personal judgment held by plaintiffs, and to the removal of which lien he…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sanford v. McLeanNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
  2. Gans v. . ThiemeNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  3. Bolman v. LohmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  4. Swan v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1854
  5. Bigelow v. ScottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API