Legal Opinion

Adams v. Highway 10 Water Pipe Line Improvement District No. 4

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 19, 1950No. 4-9298PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

Appellants, property owners within Highway 10 Water Pipe Line Improvement District No. 4, brought this suit to restrain further proceedings and for dissolution of the district.

Essential stipulated facts were: “The petitions asking the formation of Highway 10 Water Pipe Line Improvement District No. 4 were filed on October 21, 1946. and, in part, read as follows: ‘We respectfully petition the Pulaski County Court to lay off an improvement district pursuant to the provisions of Act 41 of 1941 enacted by the G-eneral Assembly of the State of Arkansas and approved February 13,1941, and all…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Conway County Bridge DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  2. Rayder v. WarrickSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  3. Pritchett v. Road Improvement District No. 3Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
  4. Hout v. HarveySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  5. Phillips v. Tyronza & St. Francis Road Improvement DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API