Legal Opinion

Phillips v. Tyronza & St. Francis Road Improvement District

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 25, 1920PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Cross Chancery Court; A. L. Hutchins, Chancellor; STATEMENT OP PACTS. P. J. Phillips brought suit in equity against the Tyronza and St. Francis Road Improvement District of Cross • County, Arkansas, which was created by act No. 140 of the acts of the special session of 1920. The complaint alleges that the estimated cost of the improvement is $427,991, and that the assessed benefits are $481,741; that the commissioners contemplated selling bonds in the sum of…

Read the full summary

Appeal from Cross Chancery Court; A. L. Hutchins, Chancellor; STATEMENT OP PACTS. P. J. Phillips brought suit in equity against the Tyronza and St. Francis Road Improvement District of Cross • County, Arkansas, which was created by act No. 140 of the acts of the special session of 1920. The complaint alleges that the estimated cost of the improvement is $427,991, and that the assessed benefits are $481,741; that the commissioners contemplated selling bonds in the sum of $427,990, which will, together with the interest, amount to approximately $700,000, and that this will exceed the total…

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

(after stating the facts).., It, is earnestly .insisted that, under the allegations of fhe.nqprplW^'j11 each case, when the interest is added-to. the .amourf of bonds proposed to be issued that the.cosf of- thq.imprqyement will exceed the total assessment of benefits, .qn^-for that reason the district is void. The. determination of this question depends upon the construction; tq.bp p,laped,-J?®on section 10, which is the same in each act.;ri.Jf .re.ad^ as follows: ,

“Section 10. The amount of,Interest,,which-,..will accrue on bonds issued by such district shaikh,e included and added to the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Conway County Bridge DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  2. Rayder v. WarrickSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  3. Pritchett v. Road Improvement District No. 3Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
  4. Pfeiffer v. BertigSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
  5. Hout v. HarveySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kersh Lake Drainage District v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
  2. Benton v. NowlinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
  3. Nunes v. CoyleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
  4. Greer v. BlockerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
  5. Richey v. Long Prairie Levee DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API