Legal Opinion
Gant v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided September 30, 1983No. 83-338PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEBEKER, Associate Judge:
This is an appeal from a denial of appellant’s motion to dismiss his indictment on double jeopardy grounds. Abney v. United States, 431 U.S. 651, 97 S.Ct. 2034, 52 L.Ed.2d 651 (1977). Appellant asserts that the trial court erred in refusing to grant an evidentiary hearing on the motion to dismiss. With the agreement of the parties, we have expedited review and disposition. We affirm the trial court’s order denying dismissal on double jeopardy grounds.
I
On October 15, 1982, appellant was convicted by a jury of rape, D.C.Code § 22-2801 (1981), carnal knowledge, id., and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Barefoot v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Blackledge v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. DinitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Stein v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Gant v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- Evans v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Green v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.