Cleary Ex Rel. Cleary v. Waldman
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ROTH, Circuit Judge.
In this appeal we must decide if New Jersey’s implementation of a portion of the Medicare Catastrophic Coverage Act (“MCCA” or the “Act”) violates Federal law. Specifically, we must determine whether New Jersey may employ an “income-first” approach, rather than a “resource-first” approach, when determining Medicaid eligibility for a spouse who is institutionalized in a long-term care facility.
I. FACTS
Thomas and Carolyne Cleary, representing themselves and a class of persons similarly situated, sued the New Jersey Department of Health Services to enjoin…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Adams Fruit Co. v. BarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. A.R., a Male Juvenile, A.R.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cleary, Cleary v. WaldmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999