Legal Opinion

Harvard Trust Co. v. Frost

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 21, 1927PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.

Lucia Ela, now deceased, by deed dated April 25,1896, constituted her sons, Walter Ela and Richard *320Ela, trustees for certain purposes which have since been accomplished. By the fourth clause it was provided that, after her death and after the death of Walter leaving no issue, the trustees were “to pay over one half of said fund to such persons and purposes as said Walter by his last will shall have appointed and in default of said appointment to such persons and purposes as said Richard shall by his last will hereafter made appoint, . . . .” By the eighth clause of the deed it was provided…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Sewall v. WilmerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
  2. Ware v. MinotMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  3. Clark v. McNeilMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  4. Lincoln v. PerryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  5. Churchill v. ChurchillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Putnam v. PutnamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  2. Estate of CarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. American Cancer Society v. Church Divinity SchoolCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Boston Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. PrindleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  5. Commissioner of Banks v. Tremont Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API