State v. Esters
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
A jury convicted Osei Myron Esters of second degree murder of his 10-week-old daughter by means of second degree assault. The jury instruction defining assault did not require the jury to find that Esters assaulted his daughter with intent to harm her. On appeal, Esters contends (1) the jury instruction defining assault was flawed because it omitted the element of specific intent to harm, and (2) the trial court should have declared a mistrial following testimony regarding his lack of grief and his post-Miranda silence. Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S. Ct. 1602, 16 L. Ed. 2d 695, 10…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. PirtleWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. PirtleWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. BergeronWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. ByrdWashington Supreme Court · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- In re the Marriage of LeslieCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
- State v. HallCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- State v. HallCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- United States v. LawrenceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- State v. KeendCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.