Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. Russos
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.
After a careful investigation of the controversy, we think there was error in the opinion of the court below that Katina Russos was not entitled to a homestead exemption in the lots in controversy.
The plaintiff had a duly docketed judgment, on 18 June, 1934, for $736.96, and interest, against the defendants Grus Russos and wife, Katina Russos, in the office of the clerk of the Superior Court for Wake County, North Carolina, and at the time Katina Russos was the owner of two lots of land in said county.
N. C. Code, 1935 (Michie), sec. 614, in part, says that such judgment “is a lien on the real…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Chadbourn Sash, Door & Blind Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
- Murchison v. . PlylerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
- Spoon v. . ReidSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
- Cheek v. . WaldenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Duplin County v. . HarrellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Stokes v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- In re HudsonDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1980