Legal Opinion

Waterman v. Hantke

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 1926PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed March 9, 1926:

Crownhart, J.

The briefs and arguments in this case were unnecessarily prolix and involved. The case does not present very difficult questions of law or fact. The plaintiff was a merchant residing and doing business at Me-nomonie. He purchased a stock of merchandise in Minneapolis, and thereafter sold the same to Edgar F. and Arvid C. Johnson, brothers, who took the goods to Abbotsford, *3Wisconsin, and placed them in a leased building with the intention to sell the same at retail. The Johnson brothers gave plaintiff a chattel mortgage in the usual…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Standard Paper Co. v. GuentherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
  2. First National Bank of Madison v. DammWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Menzies v. DoddWisconsin Supreme Court · 1865
  4. Sanger v. GuentherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re BaumgartnerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1931
  2. Heil Co. v. KelleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1933
  3. National Bond & Investment Co. v. SchmidtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1931
  4. Black & White Cattle Co. v. Shamrock Farms Co. (In Re Black & White Cattle Co.)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  5. Black & White Cattle Co. v. Shamrock Farms Co. (In Re Black & White Cattle Co.)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API