Waterman v. Hantke
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
The following opinion was filed March 9, 1926:
Crownhart, J.
The briefs and arguments in this case were unnecessarily prolix and involved. The case does not present very difficult questions of law or fact. The plaintiff was a merchant residing and doing business at Me-nomonie. He purchased a stock of merchandise in Minneapolis, and thereafter sold the same to Edgar F. and Arvid C. Johnson, brothers, who took the goods to Abbotsford, *3Wisconsin, and placed them in a leased building with the intention to sell the same at retail. The Johnson brothers gave plaintiff a chattel mortgage in the usual…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Standard Paper Co. v. GuentherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
- First National Bank of Madison v. DammWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
- Menzies v. DoddWisconsin Supreme Court · 1865
- Sanger v. GuentherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re BaumgartnerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1931
- Heil Co. v. KelleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1933
- National Bond & Investment Co. v. SchmidtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1931
- Black & White Cattle Co. v. Shamrock Farms Co. (In Re Black & White Cattle Co.)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Black & White Cattle Co. v. Shamrock Farms Co. (In Re Black & White Cattle Co.)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1983