Legal Opinion
BAKER v. WITTEVRONGEL
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided May 7, 2021No. 2:20-cv-13020Unknown
1Opinion
Not for Publication UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY RALPH BAKER, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 20-cv-13020 v. OPINION & ORDER MICHAEL WITTEVRONGEL; UNION TOWNSHIP; SGT. RANDY STRATTON; and EDWARD CHABEK, Defendants. John Michael Vazquez, U.S.D.J. Before the Court is the amended complaint, D.E. 7, of Plaintiff Ralph Baker, proceeding in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. For the reasons stated below, the Court will dismiss the Complaint for failure to state a claim. I. BACKGROUND For purposes of the pending motion, the Court incorporates by reference the background…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.