Legal Opinion
Alaska Consolidated Oil Fields v. Rains
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 5, 1932No. 6366PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILBUR, Circuit Judge.
Appellee brought this action to foreclose mechanics' liens for work done by himself and others in connection with the drilling of oil wells upon “certain oil mining claims” described in the complaint. The trial court entered a decree foreclosing such liens, and appellants have .appealed on the ground that all the lands described in the complaint and in the decree, with the exception of Chilcat No. 11 claim, were being operated by appellants *604'under oil and gas prospecting permits issued to them under the Oil Leasing Act of Congress, approved February 25, 1920 (41 Stat.…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Belk v. MeagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Johnson v. TowsleySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Marquez v. FrisbieSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Erhardt v. BoaroSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Kolachny v. GalbreathSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Tearlach Resources Ltd. v. Western States International, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013
- White v. Ames Mining CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1960
- Houck v. JoseDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1947
- Bowman v. WheelerDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1936
- Tearlach Resources Limited v. Western States InternationalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.