Legal Opinion

Newman v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 27, 1988No. 017-86PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

TEAGUE, Judge.

The record reflects that, although present and apparently available and willing to testify during its case in chief against Jack Henry Newman, a/k/a Popeye Newman, a/k/a Bull Newman, hereinafter appellant, the child-complainant in this cause was never called by the State to testify against appellant; the State opting to use in the place of her testimony a pretrial videotape recording that was made of the complainant pursuant to the provisions of Art. 38.071, V.A.C.C.P.

The jury convicted appellant of the offense of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Newman v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1985

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Harrell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  2. Chambers v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988
  3. Verell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988
  4. Pavlacka v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1993
  5. Amescua v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API