In Re the Marriage of Maricle
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GILBERT, J.
Parties represented by counsel in a marital dissolution action entered into an oral agreement to divide certain community property. The parties did not inform their attorneys. Here we hold that the trial court should not enforce such an agreement merely because it was made. We reverse.
Facts
The parties were married in June of 1963. Husband filed a petition to dissolve the marriage in November of 1983, and the court acquired jurisdiction over wife on January 9, 1984. The action was tried in February of 1988.
Both parties worked for the federal government, and each had a civil…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In Re Marriage of ElkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- In Re Marriage of WickanderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re Marriage of HassoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Jarrow Formulas, Inc. v. Nature's Way Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- In Re Marriage of HarringtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992