Legal Opinion

In Re Marriage of Harrington

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 9, 1992No. B057086Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GILBERT, J.

Husband and wife dissolve their marriage. They sell their home at a profit and divide the proceeds. The capital gains taxes due from the profits are not the same for each party. Under the facts here we hold that each party alone is liable for his or her capital gains taxes.

Wife Judith W. Harrington appeals an order denying her motion that husband Ronald G. Harrington pay one-half of the capital gains taxes recognized upon her share of profits realized from the sale of the family residence. The trial court properly decided each party alone was liable for capital gains taxes…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of FonsteinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. In Re Marriage of EpsteinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. In Re Marriage of JacobsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  4. In Re Marriage of DaviesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. In Re Marriage of ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API