In re the Estate of DeVita
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Thompson, J.
The principal issue presented on this appeal, appar*48ently one of first impression, requires us to determine whether a so-called "Spreadout Plan” (hereinafter the plan) involving the payment of future commissions of a life insurance agent, is a testamentary substitute against which his surviving spouse may exercise her statutory right of election. We find that the Surrogate properly considered the plan to be a testamentary substitute within the meaning of EPTL 5-1.1 (b) (1) (E) and properly included it in the decedent’s estate. We further concur in the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re the Estate of RiefbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- In re the Estate of AgioritisNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- In re the Estate of FabellNew York Surrogate's Court · 1983
- In re the Estate of DevitaNew York Surrogate's Court · 1986
3Cited by6 opinions
- Matter of ReynoldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Forest Glen Realty, LLC v. T11 FundingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- In re the Estate of StreetNew York Surrogate's Court · 1994
- People v. ParbhuCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2002
- In re the Estate of ReynoldsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.