Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of DeVita

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 26, 1988PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Thompson, J.

The principal issue presented on this appeal, appar*48ently one of first impression, requires us to determine whether a so-called "Spreadout Plan” (hereinafter the plan) involving the payment of future commissions of a life insurance agent, is a testamentary substitute against which his surviving spouse may exercise her statutory right of election. We find that the Surrogate properly considered the plan to be a testamentary substitute within the meaning of EPTL 5-1.1 (b) (1) (E) and properly included it in the decedent’s estate. We further concur in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of RiefbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. In re the Estate of AgioritisNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. In re the Estate of FabellNew York Surrogate's Court · 1983
  4. In re the Estate of DevitaNew York Surrogate's Court · 1986

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Matter of ReynoldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Forest Glen Realty, LLC v. T11 FundingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
  3. In re the Estate of StreetNew York Surrogate's Court · 1994
  4. People v. ParbhuCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2002
  5. In re the Estate of ReynoldsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API