Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Harris

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 16, 1972No. Appeal, No. 217PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Packel, J.,

It is the duty of a judge to transfer a criminal proceeding to the juvenile court if “it shall be ascertained *12that the person charged with the offense was under the age of 16 years at the time the alleged offense was committed. . . ,”1 The appellant at the time of the offense was less than 16 hut he told the court he was 19. He asks for post-conviction relief on the ground that the criminal court had no jurisdiction.

If the statute made non-age a jurisdictional matter,2 the conviction might well he improper notwithstanding appellant’s false testimony. However, the statute…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Hinkle v. SkeenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Wheeler v. ShoemakeMississippi Supreme Court · 1952
  3. People v. LuzovichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. State v. KlingenbergerOhio Supreme Court · 1925
  5. State v. FloresSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Clark v. PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  2. Commonwealth v. RamosSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Commonwealth v. SimsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Clark, James v. Commonwealth Of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API