Commonwealth v. Harris
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Packel, J.,
It is the duty of a judge to transfer a criminal proceeding to the juvenile court if “it shall be ascertained *12that the person charged with the offense was under the age of 16 years at the time the alleged offense was committed. . . ,”1 The appellant at the time of the offense was less than 16 hut he told the court he was 19. He asks for post-conviction relief on the ground that the criminal court had no jurisdiction.
If the statute made non-age a jurisdictional matter,2 the conviction might well he improper notwithstanding appellant’s false testimony. However, the statute…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Hinkle v. SkeenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1953
- Wheeler v. ShoemakeMississippi Supreme Court · 1952
- People v. LuzovichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- State v. KlingenbergerOhio Supreme Court · 1925
- State v. FloresSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Clark v. PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Commonwealth v. RamosSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Commonwealth v. SimsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Clark, James v. Commonwealth Of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990