Legal Opinion

Nish v. Cohen

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided April 25, 2000No. Civil Action 99-1632-APublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

LEE, District Judge.

This case involves interpretation of the Randolph-Sheppard Act (“R-S Act” or “Act”) and its applicability to appropriated fund contracts for cafeteria and military mess hall services. See 20 U.S.C.A. §§ 107-107f (West 2000). The issue for the Court is whether the inclusion of the term “cafeteria” in the 1974 Amendments to the R-S Act created a priority for blind vendors to operate military mess halls and a corresponding exception to government procurement law that normally requires government agencies to acquire goods and services through full…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sarei v. Rio Tinto PLC.District Court, C.D. California · 2002
  2. Washington State Department of Services for the Blind v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
  3. NISH v. RumsfeldDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2002
  4. Tex. Workforce Comm'n v. U.S. Dep't of Educ., Rehab. Servs. Admin.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2018
  5. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API