Legal Opinion
Diehl v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided August 24, 1938No. 11071PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SANBORN, Circuit Judge.
The appellant, with eleven other persons, was indicted under § 88, Title 18, U.S.C., 18 U.S.C.A. •§ 88, for conspiring to violate the Internal Revenue Laws of the United States with respect to selling, dealing in, possessing, transporting, removing and concealing distilled spirits upon which no tax had been paid (§§ 1394, 1397, 1441, 1287 and 1152a of Title 26, U.S.C., 26 U.S.C.A. §§ 1152a, 1287, 1394, 1397, 1441). The appellant was tried, convicted and sentenced, and has appealed.
He challenges (1) the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain his conviction; (2) the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hyde v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Goldsby v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- McDonald v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
- Galatas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
- Marx v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hewitt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- United States v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- Leeby v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951
- Elmo M. Badon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- Pullin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.