Legal Opinion

Mathews v. Butte Machinery Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 5, 1923No. 3826PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORROW, Circuit Judge.

The appellee, Butte Machinery Company, was petitioner and plaintiff in receivership proceedings in the court below. The appellant, Ed. Mathews, was receiver of the Drilling Development Company, and respondent in these proceedings.

The Drilling Development Company, a Montana corporation, hereinafter referred to as the Drilling Company, was prior to November 21, 1918, in possession of and engaged in mining certain mining claims in Eemhi county, Idaho.

On November 21, 1918, plaintiff, Butte Machinery Company, hereinafter referred to as the Machinery Company, let to the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dayton Hydraulic Co. v. FelsenthallCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1902

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. American Anthracite & Bituminous Coal Corp. v. Leonardo Arrivabene, S.A., Tramp Tankers Corporation of Liberia and Estate of Hector C. DracoulisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
  2. Oscar Heineman Corporation v. Nat Levy & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
  3. In Re Curry Printers, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 1991
  4. In Re Sturgis Iron & Metal Co., Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2009
  5. Boruff v. Cook Inlet Energy LLC (In Re Cook Inlet Energy LLC)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2018

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API