Legal Opinion

Gaied v. New York State Tax Appeals Tribunal

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 18, 2014PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Pigott, J.

On this appeal, we are asked to consider New York’s “statutory resident” test (Tax Law § 605 [b] [1] [B]) and, more specifically, the standard to be applied when determining whether a person “maintains a permanent place of abode” in New York. Petitioner John Gaied contends that the question should turn on whether he maintained living arrangements for himself to reside at the dwelling. We agree with petitioner and hold that in order for an individual to qualify as a statutory resident, there must be some basis to conclude that the dwelling was utilized as the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tamagni v. Tax Appeals TribunalNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. MATTER OF SIEMENS CORP. v. Tax Appeals TribunalNew York Court of Appeals · 1997

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Matter of Obus v. New York State Tax Appeals Trib.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
  2. Matter of Obus v. New York State Tax Appeals Trib.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
  3. Matter of Ruderman v. Tax Appeals Trib. of The State of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
  4. Zanetti v. New York State Tax Appeals TribunalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  5. Zanetti v. New York State Tax Appeals TribunalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API