Legal Opinion

Puntasecca v. Violent Crimes Compensation Board

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided December 12, 1986Published

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

LANDAU, J.S.C.

(temporarily assigned).

Claimant Eugene Puntasecca (Puntasecca), a Teaneck firefighter, appeals from a final determination of the Violent Crimes Compensation Board (Board) which denied his claim for compensation for certain lost earnings resulting from injuries he sustained while engaged in extinguishing an arson-caused fire.

The sole basis for rejection of his claim disclosed by the record was the Board’s determination that the “fireman’s rule” recognized in Berko v. Freda, 93 N.J. 81 (1983) precluded such *371award because Puntasecca’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Krauth v. Israel Geller and Buckingham Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  2. Berko v. FredaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  3. Mahoney v. Carus Chemical Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  4. White v. Violent Crimes Compensation BoardSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
  5. In Re HollywoodNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API