Smith v. Hopper
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Tallman, J., entered April 17, 1911, in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial before the court without a jury, in1 an action to foreclose a mechanics’ lien.
1Opinion of the CourtMount, J.
Plaintiff brought this action to foreclose a mechanics’ lien. The trial'court entered a judgment in his favor for $75, with interest and costs, and ordered a sale of the liened property to satisfy the judgment. The defendants have appealed.
It appears that the defendants Wiley and Leiendecker had *225a contract for the construction of a' dwelling house for the defendants Hopper and wife. These contractors sublet the painting of the house to the plaintiff, for $230. Plaintiff did a part of the work, but did not complete the same because the character thereof was changed after he had begun work, and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Heald v. HodderWashington Supreme Court · 1893
- Cochran v. YohoWashington Supreme Court · 1904
3Cited by4 opinions
- Layrite Products Company v. LuxIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
- Caird Engineering Works v. Seven-Up Gold Mining Co., Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1940
- Des Moines Furnace & Stove Repair Co. v. LemonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1953
- Caird Engineering Works v. Seven-Up Gold Mining Co., Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1940