Legal Opinion
City of Indianapolis v. Huegele
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided October 10, 1888No. 14,307PublishedCited by 25 opinions
From the Marion Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtZollars, J.
Section 2 of an ordinance of the city of Indianapolis, passed in 1866, is as follows:
“Any person who shall wrongfully interfere with any policeman or officer of said city, while making an arrest, shall be fined in any sum not exceeding one hundred dollars.”
Can appellee be fined under this ordinance for having interfered with a policeman in making an arrest in 1887 ? If he can, the judgment must be reversed. If he can not, the court below ruled correctly, and the judgment must be affirmed.
Section 67 of the criminal procedure act of .1881, R. S. 1881, section 1640, provides that “."Whenever any…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- City of Valparaiso v. GardnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- People, Ex Rel. Wood v. . LacombeNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Middleton v. GreesonIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Barnett v. HarshbargerIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Robinson v. SkipworthIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. GerhardtIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MontgomeryIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
- Rose v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
- Henderson v. State ex rel. StoutIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
- State ex rel. City of Terre Haute v. KolsemIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.