Legal Opinion

Deupree v. Payne

California Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1925No. Docket No. L.A. 8863PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.

The petitioner herein by his original application applied for a writ of mandate to he directed to the respondent herein in his capacity as county auditor of the county of Los Angeles, commanding him to audit and approve the petitioner’s claim and demand for the sum of seventy dollars, alleged to be the salary due and payable to petitioner as justice of the peace of Lankershim township of the comity of Los Angeles for the month of July, 1925, and which said sum the respondent as such auditor has refused to audit, approve, and allow in its entirety. The particular facts upon which said…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re HoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. McKannay v. HortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Boyd v. PendegastCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  4. Bakkenson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Martello v. Superior Court of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Thompson v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. Beck v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  4. In Re MizeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Hafliger v. County of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API