Legal Opinion
Digi-Tel Holdings, Inc. v. Proteq Telecommunications (Pte), Ltd., Brustuen International, Inc., Intervenor
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided July 11, 1996No. 95-2853PublishedCited by 216 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRIGHT, Circuit Judge.
Digi-Tel Holdings, Inc. (Digi-Tel) appeals the order of the district court 1 dismissing its breach of contract and fraud claims against Proteq Telecommunications (PTE), Ltd. (Proteq) for lack of personal jurisdiction. The district court held that the exercise of personal jurisdiction over Proteq, a Singapore company, was not consistent with due process because Proteq did not have sufficient “minimum contacts” with the State of Minnesota. We affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
Proteq, a Singapore company, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Proteq Technologies PTE, Ltd., a Singapore company,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by216 opinions
- K-V Pharmaceutical Co. v. J. Uriach & CIA, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Red Wing Shoe Company, Inc. v. Hockerson-Halberstadt, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Johnson v. ArdenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- Fastpath, Inc. v. Arbela Technologies Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
- Stevens v. RedwingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
211 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.