Legal Opinion

Meek v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 24, 1943No. 9389PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Indicted for violating the provisions. of § 215(a) (3), 29 U.S.C.A., a provision of the Fair Labor Standards Act which prohibits discharge of employees because of their complaints for violation of the provisions of the Act, Meek was convicted for the unlawful discharge of one Crutcher, and Winter for the unlawful discharge of Barnes. Meek assails the conviction on the ground that he could not be guilty of discharging Crutcher because he was not his employer, and both appellants complain of the insufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict.

Meek’s separable contention is that he had no…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bowe v. Judson C. Burns, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943
  2. Nichamin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1920
  3. United States v. GardzielewskiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. David L. ShaferCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  2. W. Willard Wirtz, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Ross Packaging Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
  3. Acosta v. Foreclosure Connection, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
  4. Montano-Perez v. Durrett Cheese Sales, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2009
  5. Acosta v. Foreclosure ConnectionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API