Legal Opinion

Conservatorship of Cooper

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 8, 1993No. F018012PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FRANSON, J. *

Statement of Case and Facts

This appeal is a consolidation of a number of appeals from the orders of Judge Donald Cantwell settling accounts in conservatorship proceedings. Pursuant to these orders, the public guardian was surcharged in whole or in part for the bond fee which was charged by the public guardian and deposited in the county treasury in the individual estates under Probate Code section 2942, subdivision (c). 1 In disallowing the fees, the judge first held the statute violated the equal protection clause by “selecting a particular class of persons for a species…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Village of Belle Terre v. BoraasSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Department of Mental Hygiene v. KirchnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Rees v. LaytonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Trust Services of America, Inc. v. Van de KampCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Pereira and Melo DairyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 2005
  2. Baron v. Galactic Co., LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API