Legal Opinion
Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Cinisomo
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 25, 1993PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In a proceeding to permanently stay the arbitration of a claim for underinsured motorist benefits, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Becker, J.), dated July 16, 1991, which granted the petition and denied the appellant’s cross motion to dismiss the petition.
Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, with costs, the petition is denied, and the cross motion to compel arbitration is granted to the extent indicated herein.
Mario Cinisomo was allegedly injured in an automobile accident on April 22, 1989, and sought to claim underinsured *684motorist benefits…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between Knickerbocker Insurance & GilbertNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
- Terwilliger v. American Motorists InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. AnnunziatoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Casualty & Surety Co. v. SchulmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- ATM One v. LandaverdeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Northern Assurance Co. of America v. BollingerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Allstate Insurance v. GellerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Nationwide Insurance v. MiscioneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Great American Insurance v. GarciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998