Legal Opinion

Casualty & Surety Co. v. Schulman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 4, 1990PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to permanently stay arbitration, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Burstein, J.), dated September 14, 1988, which denied its application and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the petition is granted, and arbitration of the respondent’s supplementary uninsured motorist claim is permanently stayed.

The "declarations page” of the automobile insurance policy issued by the petitioner to the respondent indicates that the respondent purchased…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Maurizzio v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. In re the Arbitration between Aetna Casualty & Surety Insurance & SchulmanNew York Supreme Court · 1988

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. CinisomoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. KunzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. In re the Arbitration between Michigan Mutual Insurance & MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API