Innes v. Innes
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
117 N.J. 496 (1990)
569 A.2d 770
FRANK T. INNES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
NITA L. INNES, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued April 24, 1989.
Decided January 17, 1990.
James J. Byrnes argued the cause for appellant (Byrnes & Guidera, attorneys).
John A. Craner argued the cause for respondent (Libby E. Sachar, attorney; Norman W. Albert, of counsel; Libby E. Sachar, Norman W. Albert, and John A. Craner, on the briefs).
James P. Yudes submitted a brief on behalf of amici curiae Family Law Section and Women's Rights Section of the New Jersey State Bar Association.
The opinion of the…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Stein; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · O'Hern.
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Lepis v. LepisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Rothman v. RothmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
- State v. ButlerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- Gibbons v. GibbonsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- Kimmelman v. Henkels & McCoy, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.