Legal Opinion

Innes v. Innes

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 17, 1990Published

1Opinion of the Court

117 N.J. 496 (1990)

569 A.2d 770

FRANK T. INNES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

NITA L. INNES, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued April 24, 1989.

Decided January 17, 1990.

James J. Byrnes argued the cause for appellant (Byrnes & Guidera, attorneys).

John A. Craner argued the cause for respondent (Libby E. Sachar, attorney; Norman W. Albert, of counsel; Libby E. Sachar, Norman W. Albert, and John A. Craner, on the briefs).

James P. Yudes submitted a brief on behalf of amici curiae Family Law Section and Women's Rights Section of the New Jersey State Bar Association.

The opinion of the…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Stein; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · O'Hern.

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Lepis v. LepisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  2. Rothman v. RothmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
  3. State v. ButlerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  4. Gibbons v. GibbonsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  5. Kimmelman v. Henkels & McCoy, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1987

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API