Legal Opinion

People v. Preuss

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided December 21, 1995No. 94CA1430PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge TAUBMAN.

In this appeal, the dispositive issue is whether the constitutional guarantee against double jeopardy was violated when defendant, Kurt Preuss, had his probationary status revoked and a consecutive sentence imposed because of a subsequent criminal conviction. We conclude there was no constitutional violation and, hence, affirm the sentence imposed.

On July 31,1992, defendant was charged in Larimer County with two counts of aggravated incest involving his nine-year-old daughter. Pursuant to a plea agreement, defendant pled guilty and was sentenced to four years…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. United States v. Sandra ClaytonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  4. Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
  5. People v. HrapskiSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. FirthColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. People v. MartinColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. People v. JohnsonColorado Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. State of West Virginia v. Michael FaulknerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API