Legal Opinion

Krafka v. Brase

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided August 17, 1984No. 83-603PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Colwell, D. J., Retired.

Plaintiff, Clarence Krafka, appeals the dismissal of his suit tp enjoin defendant, Irene Brase, from stopping the natural flow of surface water which caused ponding damage to plaintiff. The trial judge personally inspected the lands. We affirm.

Krafka assigns a.s error that the injunction should have been granted on the evidence and as a matter of law. Further error is claimed on the basis that he had acquired a prescriptive right for drainage of water through an artificial culvert.

While we review these cases de novo, the rule is that where there are issues of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nichol v. YocumNebraska Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Sullivan v. HoffmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Nickman v. KirschnerNebraska Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Kluck v. MentzerNebraska Supreme Court · 1984

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Romshek v. OsantowskiNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Gruber v. County of DawsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Shotkoski v. PrososkiNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Schnakenberg v. SchroederNebraska Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API