Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Washington Wildlife Preservation, Inc. v. State

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 14, 1983No. 82-150, 82-151PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCOTT, Justice.

Plaintiffs, members of Washington Wildlife Preservation, Inc., brought this action in response to the purchase of a railroad right-of-way by defendants State of Minnesota and its Department of Natural Resources from defendant Soo Line Railroad Company. Plaintiffs, Washington County landowners whose property adjoins the right-of-way, seek, inter alia, a declaration that they are the true owners of the right-of-way.

Plaintiffs moved for a partial summary judgment on their first cause of action, relating to their claim of ownership of the right-of-way. Defendants filed a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Cater v. Northwestern Telephone Exchange Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  3. Faus v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Bernards v. LinkOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Pollnow v. Department of Natural ResourcesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Preseault v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Preseault v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  3. Lawson v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Chevy Chase Land Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  5. Macy Elevator, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API