Legal Opinion
United States v. Marubeni America Corporation and Hitachi Cable, Ltd.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 10, 1980No. 79-1327PublishedCited by 69 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge.
The substantive issue is whether the criminal forfeiture provided by the Racketeering and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) is limited to interests “in an enterprise.” The district court held that it is. We affirm.
FACTS
Marubeni America Corporation (Marubeni) and Hitachi Cable, Ltd., (Hitachi) are engaged in the production and sales of electrical cable. Marubeni is incorporated in the United States. Hitachi is a Japanese corporation.
Anchorage Telephone Utility (ATU) is an instrumentality of the Municipality of Anchorage, Alaska. Between the spring of 1970 and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Sanabria v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. Milton Parness and Barbara ParnessCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Nicholas AlbertiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Thomas SanabriaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. Mohammad Reza MehrmaneshCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Charles T. Walsh and Bowe, Walsh & AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Lawrence S. BloomCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- United States v. James E. BusherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.