Legal Opinion

Lemmers v. Hart Schaffner & Marx

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided February 26, 1987No. CV 85-0-1033PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

BEAM, Chief Judge.

This matter is before the Court upon the motion of defendant, Hart Schaffner & Marx (HSM), for a directed verdict of dismissal. The motion was made after the plaintiff, Patrick C. Lemmers, had rested his case-in-chief. The Court finds that the motion should be sustained and the action dismissed.

Plaintiff’s action is based upon the tort of interference with the terms and conditions of a contract. Plaintiff, Patrick C. Lemmers, alleges that he had entered into an oral contract with Jerry Ryan in which Ryan agreed to purchase plaintiff’s interest in Lemmers & Ryan,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ernest C. Williams v. A. Mensey R. Bordeaux J. Simmons v. Vaughn Armstrong W. Pecha St. Louis County Edward M. Moreland William BreedingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
  2. J.E.K. Industries, Inc. v. Hal G. ShoemakerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  3. Frank Svoboda, D/B/A Circle Rain Irrigation Company v. Bowers Distillery, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bird v. Crown Convenience (In re NWFX, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
  2. In Re: Nwfx, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API