Legal Opinion
Battle v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided January 4, 2018No. 16-AA-1154PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Glickman, Associate Judge:
Phillip Battle petitions- for review of the order denying his workers’ compensation claim for temporary total disability benefits and associated medical costs.. The Compensation Review Board (the “CRB”) affirmed the finding by an Administrative Law Judge, (the “ALJ”) that Mr, Battle’s disabling back condition was not causally related, to his employment. Because we hold that there was. insufficient evidence in the record to rebut the presumption.that Mr. Battle’s injury was causetd, or aggravated by his working conditions, we reverse and remand for further,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Dietrich v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning AdjustmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
- Ferreira v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Georgetown University Hospital v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- William David Hensley v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- Miller Transporters, Inc. v. GuthrieMississippi Supreme Court · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Maria Ramos v. DC DOESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2020
- Maria Ramos v. DC DOESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2020
- Metro Fire Prot. v. D.C. Dep't of Emp't Servs.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
- Quaranta v. DC Dep't of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2022