Legal Opinion
In re California Bail Bond Antitrust Litigation
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 11, 2025No. 4:19-cv-00717Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 Case No. 19-cv-00717-JST IN RE CALIFORNIA BAIL BOND 8 ANTITRUST LITIGATION ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT 9 LEXINGTON NATIONAL INSURANCE CORPORATION AND AMERICAN 10 SURETY COMPANY’S MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM NON-DISPOSITIVE 11 This order relates to: PRETRIAL ORDER OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE 12 ALL ACTIONS Re: ECF No. 536 13 14 15 Before the Court is Defendants Lexington National Insurance Corporation (“Lexington”) 16 and American Surety Company’s (“ASC”) (together, “Moving Defendants”) motion for relief 17 from a non-dispositive…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jerome Grimes v. City and County of San Francisco, Defendant-Cross-Defendant-Appellee, and Nathan Johnson, Defendant-Cross-Claimant-Appellant. Jerome Grimes v. City and County of San Francisco, Defendant-Cross-Defendant-Appellant, and Nathan Johnson, Defendant-Cross-Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Wolpin v. Philip Morris Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1999
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoenas Dated March 9, 2001District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- United States v. Duke Energy Corp.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2003
- In re Premera Blue Cross Customer Data Sec. Breach Litig.District Court, D. Oregon · 2017