Legal Opinion

Carr v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided June 8, 1929No. A-6779PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChappedl, J.

The plaintiffs in error, hereinafter called defendants, were convicted in the district court of Payne county on the charge of grand larceny and their punishment fixed by the jury at imprisonment in the state penitentiary for a period of two years.

The defendant in his brief argues but one question, prejudicial remarks, statements, and arguments of the county attorney. The record discloses that in the opening argument the county attorney made the following statement : “Any man who would believe their story is a friend to the outlaw. By Mr. Moore: The defendants except to the statement.” While…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tapedo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
  2. Allen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Thacker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wallace v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Paramore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1930
  3. Golding v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929
  4. Foster v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API