Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Ross v. Smith (In Re Gavin)

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 15, 1995No. 19-11441PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVID A. SCHOLL, Chief Judge.

A. INTRODUCTION

Resolution of the above-captioned adversary proceeding and related matters arising out of two separate bankruptcy cases requires analysis of 11 U.S.C. § 110, a Code section enacted as part of the Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1994 to regulate the conduct of lay persons who assist debtors in preparing bankruptcy petitions for compensation. It is clear that four separate requirements of this Code section, §§ 110(b)(1), (c)(1), (f)(1), and (h)(1), were patently violated by the bankruptcy preparers in issue, “Legal Aid Services” (“LAS”) of Palmdale,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Hipp, Inc., Debtor. Thomas J. Griffith, Trustee v. David OlesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  2. In Re BachmannUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 1990
  3. In Re EvansUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Fleet v. United States Consumer Council, Inc. (In Re Fleet)District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. In Re GrimesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Dakota · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. In Re GuttierezUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 2000
  2. In Re HerreraUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
  3. In Re MoffettUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2001
  4. In Re KaitangianUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 1998
  5. Consumer Seven Corp. v. United States Trustee (In Re Fraga)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1997

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API