Legal Opinion
Flushing Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Kapner
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 19, 1954PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHallinan, J.
This motion for an order directing the treasurer of the City of New York to pay surplus moneys deposited with him is, in effect, a motion to confirm the report of a referee in surplus moneys proceedings.
Two actions in foreclosure were heretofore consolidated by an order of this court, which directed that the surplus moneys proceedings be referred to a referee to hear and report the amount due to the claimants and their various priorities. There was a surplus of $1,825.50 in the Kapner action and a surplus of $3,516.27 in the Semon action. The total surplus of $5,341.77 is insufficient to pay…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Marshall v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Matter of Carnegie Trust CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Wood v. . ChapinNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
- Nutt v. . CumingNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Wise v. L. & C. Wise Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1897
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Valley National Bank of Long Island v. LevyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- Long Island Insurance v. S & L DelicatessenNew York Supreme Court · 1980
- Cadlerock Joint Venture v. KhanNew York Supreme Court · 2000