Legal Opinion

In re J.W.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided July 3, 2019No. 2018-0404Published

1Opinion of the CourtHantz Marconi, J.

The petitioners, M.F. and C.N., are unmarried, cohabitating adults who jointly petitioned to adopt M.F.'s minor biological son, J.W. The Circuit Court ( Moran , J.) ruled that RSA 170-B:4 (2014) does not authorize such an adoption and dismissed the petition. See RSA 170-B:4 (governing who may adopt). On appeal, the petitioners argue that the trial court erred because they are eligible to jointly adopt J.W. pursuant to RSA 170-B:4, II and III. We affirm.

The relevant facts follow. M.F. is the biological father of J.W., who was born in 2007. M.F. has been in a relationship with C.N. since…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Vogel v. VogelSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  2. In Interest of Angel Lace M.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Adoptions of B.L.V.B.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  4. Adoption of TammyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  5. Bridges v. NicelyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API