In re J.W.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtHantz Marconi, J.
The petitioners, M.F. and C.N., are unmarried, cohabitating adults who jointly petitioned to adopt M.F.'s minor biological son, J.W. The Circuit Court ( Moran , J.) ruled that RSA 170-B:4 (2014) does not authorize such an adoption and dismissed the petition. See RSA 170-B:4 (governing who may adopt). On appeal, the petitioners argue that the trial court erred because they are eligible to jointly adopt J.W. pursuant to RSA 170-B:4, II and III. We affirm.
The relevant facts follow. M.F. is the biological father of J.W., who was born in 2007. M.F. has been in a relationship with C.N. since…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Vogel v. VogelSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- In Interest of Angel Lace M.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
- Adoptions of B.L.V.B.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1993
- Adoption of TammyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
- Bridges v. NicelyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.