Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Williams

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 15, 2013No. 48,003-CAPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPitman, J.

|, Defendant/Plaintiff in rule, Jeffrey Williams, appeals a judgment denying a “Rule to Show Cause Why Judgment of Child Support Should Not Be Amended.” In 2012, Defendant sought to have a 2003 stipulated judgment of child support amended to reflect the allegedly proper intent of the parties. The trial court denied the motion, finding that the written judgment properly reflected the intent of the parties. The trial court also found that it was without authority to substantively amend the judgment. For the following reasons, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

FACTS

In 2002, Rosalind…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Villaume v. VillaumeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
  2. Hebert v. HebertSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
  3. Bourgeois v. KostSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
  4. LaBove v. TheriotSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
  5. Posey v. SingletaryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2003

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ast v. AstLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. Carmichael v. BrooksLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. Catalanotto v. CatalanottoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. Crawford v. CrawfordLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. Entrada Co. v. PressleyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API