Smith v. Lanier

1. The direction of a verdict on the theory that a divisional line had been established by parol agreement between coterminous landowners was not authorized, since the evidence did not show that the agreement was made in consequence of an indefinite, unascertained, or disputed line; and the agreement was not with respect to lands which had already been conveyed.

2. Although a divisional line may be established by acquiescence for seven years by acts or declarations of adjoining landowners, without regard to whether the line was indefinite, unascertained, or disputed, this principle is not…