Legal Opinion

Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. Sales Affiliates, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 27, 1958PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IRVING R. KAUFMAN, District Judge.

On April 30, 1954, this Court held, in a declaratory action between the parties to the instant proceeding, that defendant’s U. S. Patent No. 2,577,-710 (hereinafter called “710”) was invalid.1 At that time, the defendant had a continuation-in-part application pending before the Patent Office. In January 1955, the defendant assigned that application to a Virginia Corporation, Tidewater Patent Development Company (hereinafter called “Tidewater”). On February 28, 1956, the application ripened into a granted patent, U. S. Patent No. 2,736,323 (hereinafter called…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. Sales Affiliates, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1954
  2. Ryan v. Arabian American Oil Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1955
  3. Cristobal C. Hines v. Joaquin A. PerezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  4. Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. Sales Affiliates, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1957
  5. Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. Sales Affiliates, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tidewater Patent Development Company, Incorporated v. K. M. Kitchen and Virginia M. Kitchen, Partners Trading as K. M. Kitchenbeauty Supply CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
  2. Tidewater Patent Development Company, Incorporated v. Gillette CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1960
  3. Tidewater Patent Development Company, Incorporated v. K. M. Kitchen and Virginia M. Kitchen, Partners Trading as K. M. Kitchenbeauty Supply CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API