Armstrong, Cator & Co. v. Holland
Supreme Court of Florida
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval county. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the» Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Mabry, C. J.:
The above cases involve the same question, and the following opinion in the case of Armstrong, Cator & Co. vs. Daniel P. Holland will dispose of the other cases.
After the filing of a praecipe and the issuance of a summons in an action commenced by appellants against, appellee, a writ of attachment was issued based upon affidavit and bond. The affidavit, made by an agent, states that the appellee was indebted to appellants in the sum of §950.00, actually due, and that affiant had reason to believe that appellee was fraudulently disposing of his property. There was a traverse of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Preston v. SpauldingIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
- Holt & Chambers v. BancroftSupreme Court of Alabama · 1857
- Van Patten v. BurrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
- Perry v. VezinaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884
- Gage & Co. v. ParrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Jackson v. Citizens Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1907
- Wylly-Gabbett Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1907