Legal Opinion

White v. Besse

California Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1904No. S.F. No. 2996PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Charles M. Cassin, and Charles B. Younger, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

The complaint states a cause of action against the defendant, Besse, as sheriff of Santa Cruz County, to enjoin him from selling certain land, alleged to be the prop erty of the plaintiff, upon an execution issued on a judgment recovered by Lee, the intervener, against Edward White, the husband of the plaintiff. The judgment creditor, Lee, by leave of the court, intervened and filed his complaint in intervention. The court after a trial made its decision and gave judgment in favor of the plaintiff. The intervener alone appeals from the judgment upon the judgment-roll.

The plaintiff alleges,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bull v. BrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Threlkel v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Haas v. WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Knox v. MosesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Turner v. Citizens National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  2. In re Liquimatic Systems, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API