Narango v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
LATTIMORE, Judge.
Appellant was convicted of the theft of property of the value of more than $50, and his punishment fixed at two years confinement in the penitentiary.
We are met on the threshold of the consideration of this case, by a motion made by our Assistant Attorney General, to strike from the record what purports to be a statement of facts, which is copied in the transcript. Such practice in a felony case seems not to be in accordance with our statutes. See Art. 844c, which requires the filing of duplicate statement of facts with the clerk of the trial court, and that the original be…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gould v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Luttrell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899
- Slatter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cofflin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
- Shipley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Barber v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Ritchie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1961